Comparison

clarketm proxy-list (GitHub) alternatives when the list stops refreshing

Weighing up clarketm proxy-list (GitHub)? What is actually published, what it does not tell you, and how to settle the decision on your own target for a few dollars.

HProxy Team··4 min read
HProxy.Comparison

Free proxies won't hold up here.

Shared datacenter IPs get flagged and dropped fast. When it has to hold, gaming, streaming, accounts, you need mobile and residential IPs that read as a real device, from $0.44/GB, pay as you go.

See plans & pricing

Every free proxy list page, ours included, is built from advertised prices and claimed pool sizes. Those two materials cannot tell you what you actually need to know, so this page spends most of its length on what they leave out.

What is on file for clarketm proxy-list (GitHub)

You will find them at github.com/clarketm/proxy-list. In our own records they sit in the free proxy list category.

There is no price in this comparison because we do not have one we can date and attribute. What follows instead is the set of questions that decide the cost once you do read their page.

When you do read it, note four things: the rate you actually qualify for today, the minimum purchase, whether unused balance expires, and whether failed requests are billed. Those four decide the real cost more than the headline does.

clarketm proxy-list (GitHub) in its own words

The title tag on 9 September 2026 was "GitHub - clarketm/proxy-list: A list of free, public, forward proxy servers. UPDATED DAILY! · GitHub". Written for search engines, their description says: "A list of free, public, forward proxy servers. UPDATED DAILY! - clarketm/proxy-list"

What else that page states, without interpretation:

The product lines named on that page are SOCKS5. Support is advertised as around the clock. Their pricing page is titled "Pricing · Plans for every developer · GitHub".

Nothing there has been tested. It is a record of what the page said on the day, which is the honest limit of what a page like this can offer without a measurement.

How far back the record goes

The domain was registered on 9 October 2007, through MarkMonitor Inc, which makes it about 18 years old. Checked against the registry on 9 September 2026. The registration currently runs to 9 October 2028.

None of it predicts success rate. It is here because domain age and archive depth are free to check, and a provider whose public record starts last quarter deserves a smaller first order.

Who is behind the list

We checked this one by hand on 6 September 2026. It is a repository, and we record the operator as github. Evidence recorded: 2,385 stars, last push 2026-03-01. Stale since March 2026.

It is a public repository rather than a business. Repository lists are usually the freshest thing in this category and the least supported: nobody is on call when the scraper behind it stops.

Every list in this category has the same underlying problem, which is decay. We measure it on our own network and publish it: 4023 alive right now out of 589918 ever discovered, median lifespan 145 hours. A list is only as good as its last check.

The questions behind the numbers

Shared or dedicated changes everything

A shared address arrives with a history you did not create and cannot see. For read-only work it rarely matters. For anything that keeps a session, it is the most common cause of unexplained failure.

The country total, and the country you use

Ask for the pool size in your country rather than in total, and expect the answer to be vague. Where it is not published, the ten minute test at the end of this page settles it for a few dollars.

The response time nobody advertises

Every provider works when nothing is wrong. The difference shows up on the day a subnet gets flagged or a gateway stops answering. Before committing volume, send one real question through the support channel and time the reply.

The comparison, honestly framed

Compare on these rows and ignore the feature lists on both sites:

Question to askclarketm proxy-list (GitHub)HProxy
Entry priceNot verified by us, read their pageFrom $0.44/GB, pay as you go
Does unused balance expire?Their terms page answers thisNever
Minimum commitmentWorth confirming in writing before you commitNone
Identity checksRead their current termsCard orders are screened, and verification is sometimes requested
TargetingOn their own terms pageCountry, city and ISP
Free way to evaluateNot published clearly, ask before payingFree proxy list and proxy checker

A table like this can rank the things that are written down. It cannot rank the thing that matters most, which is how the network behaves against the site you care about.

The test that beats this page

It is a small amount of money for an answer that is actually about your target.

  1. Take the smallest paid unit each provider will sell you. A free trial works for a first pass, though trials sometimes ride better pools than paid plans do.
  2. Fire the same batch through both on one afternoon. Different days are different conditions, and that ruins the comparison.
  3. Write down two numbers per provider: the share of requests that succeeded, and the traffic it cost.
  4. Take a handful of the addresses you were given and verify their country and type against a checker you do not control.
  5. Choose on the measurement, not the marketing, and expect the answer to change within a year.

Comparable providers

We hold the same record for these, and the same honest limits apply to each:

What we sell, stated plainly

For completeness: residential from $0.44 per GB, city and ISP targeting included, no monthly minimum, and a balance that stays where you left it. We are a good fit for uneven workloads and a poor one for anybody who wants a signed enterprise agreement.

Frequently asked questions

Why look for a clarketm proxy-list (GitHub) alternative at all?
The usual reasons any buyer compares two providers: the pricing model stopped fitting the usage pattern, a target started blocking, a specific country underperformed, a balance expired, or support went quiet. None of those is visible from a marketing page, which is why a small paid test on your own target settles it faster than any review.
What does clarketm proxy-list (GitHub) advertise?
We do not hold a current, sourced price for clarketm proxy-list (GitHub), so this page does not print one. Read their own pricing page for the rate, the minimum and the commitment, and note the date you read it, because all three move.
How do I compare two providers fairly?
Match the units first, because residential is billed per gigabyte, datacenter and ISP per address, and mobile per day or per port. Then compare the rate you can actually reach today rather than the volume tier behind a commitment. Finish by measuring the success rate on your own target, since a cheap request that fails costs more than a dearer one that works.
Is a cheaper provider usually worse?
Not reliably. Price in this market reflects the supply model and the sales overhead as much as the network. What price does not tell you is the success rate on your target, and that is the figure that decides whether the cheaper option was cheap or expensive. Measure before assuming either way.
Why do free proxy lists stop working so quickly?
Because the addresses on them are mostly misconfigured devices that get fixed, or short-lived hosts that get shut down. We measure this on our own free network: of 589918 addresses discovered, 4023 were answering at the last check. A list without a check date is telling you nothing about today.

Proxies that don't die mid-job

Residential, ISP, datacenter and mobile, verified by the same engine that runs tens of millions of checks. They read as a real device and hold up under load. Pay as you go, and your balance never expires. $0.44/GB is the 2,000 GB+ rate; a single gigabyte is $0.50/GB, with no minimum order.

129M+ proxy checks run · 100+ countries · HTTP / HTTPS / SOCKS · re-checked every few minutes · no signup