We compete with Proxyon, so treat every line below as coming from an interested party. What follows is the record we hold, the questions their marketing page does not answer, and a test you can run yourself that outranks this page and every other review.
Everything we can stand behind
Their site is proxyon.io.
We have no verified current rate for Proxyon on file. Printing a guess would make this page worse than useless, so the price row below is empty and the reading list is not.
The four figures worth copying down are the rate without a commitment, the smallest purchase allowed, what happens to unspent balance, and whether a failed request still costs money.
Their own description, read this week
On 9 September 2026 the site introduced itself as "Proxyon: Proxies that just work". The blurb under their search result reads: "Residential, datacenter, IPv6 datacenter, and IPv6 rotating proxies with pay-as-you-go pricing. No subscriptions, no hidden fees."
Also on the page, stated plainly:
The product lines named on that page are residential, datacenter, ISP or static residential, SOCKS5 and IPv6. They advertise 195 countries or locations. Payment methods mentioned: PayPal, crypto and cards. Their pricing page is titled "Proxyon: Pricing".
Every line above is a quotation from their marketing rather than a measurement by us. It is included because it is checkable, not because it is evidence of performance.
How long Proxyon has been trading
The domain was registered on 3 July 2025, through NameCheap, Inc, which makes it about 1 year old. We pulled that from the registry on 23 April 2026. The Internet Archive holds 4 snapshots of the site, the earliest from November 2025. The current registration term ends 3 July 2026.
None of it predicts success rate. It is here because domain age and archive depth are free to check, and a provider whose public record starts last quarter deserves a smaller first order.
What our crawl found
We crawled 169 pages of their site and found 142 blog pages, 1 pricing page and 1 use-case page.
Site size is a signal about marketing budget rather than network quality, and the two are frequently unrelated. It is useful for a different reason: a provider with many pricing pages is usually segmenting hard, and a provider with none is selling by quotation.
Whether anyone is still working on it
Our crawl of their site found 162 pages carrying a date, 142 of them articles. The oldest is from June 2026 and the newest from August 2026. 162 of them carry a date inside the last twelve months.
Timestamps are not quality, and a company still publishing is at least a company still trading. That is worth more than it sounds in a market where providers disappear without notice.
What you still do not know after reading their site
The entry price is not the effective price
Rates in this market are quoted from the bottom of the table. The relevant question is which row you land on at your volume, and whether reaching a cheaper row costs more in commitment than it saves per unit.
What happens at the end of the month
This single term separates cheap providers from providers that look cheap. If a plan resets at month end, your effective rate is the plan price divided by what you actually used. Ours does not expire, which is easy to say and easy to verify in the terms.
What the lowest rate actually costs
Treat a required call with a salesperson as a cost. It delays the work, it usually arrives with an annual term attached, and it exists because the published price is negotiable in one direction only.
The two of us, on the questions that matter
Here are the comparisons that survive contact with a real workload:
| Question to ask | Proxyon | HProxy |
|---|---|---|
| Entry price | Not verified by us, read their page | From $0.44/GB, pay as you go |
| Does unused balance expire? | Their terms page answers this | Never |
| Minimum commitment | Worth confirming in writing before you commit | None |
| Identity checks | Read their current terms | Card orders are screened, and verification is sometimes requested |
| Targeting | Worth confirming in writing before you commit | Country, city and ISP |
| Free way to evaluate | Read their current terms | Free proxy list and proxy checker |
Treat the right-hand column as a claim by an interested party, because it is one. Every line in it is checkable on our own pages and in our own terms.
What to do instead of reading more comparisons
The steps below take about ten minutes and settle the question properly.
- Fund both accounts with the least money each will accept, and note what that minimum was, because it is part of the comparison.
- Aim both at the page that matters to you rather than a test endpoint, and keep every other variable fixed.
- Record the success rate and the data consumed for the identical batch on each side.
- Check some of the addresses yourself for country, ASN and type before you trust the label on the plan.
- Keep the winner, and repeat the whole thing quarterly, because pools age.
Comparable providers
We hold the same record for these, and the same honest limits apply to each:
- Goproxy alternatives
- Gotoproxy alternatives
- Goubanjia alternatives
- GpmProxy alternatives
- Gradient Network alternatives
- Grass alternatives
Where we fit
For completeness: residential from $0.44 per GB, city and ISP targeting included, no monthly minimum, and a balance that stays where you left it. We are a good fit for uneven workloads and a poor one for anybody who wants a signed enterprise agreement.
