We compete with 911Proxy, so treat every line below as coming from an interested party. What follows is the record we hold, the questions their marketing page does not answer, and a test you can run yourself that outranks this page and every other review.
What is on file for 911Proxy
Their site is 911proxy.com.
There is no price in this comparison because we do not have one we can date and attribute. What follows instead is the set of questions that decide the cost once you do read their page.
The four figures worth copying down are the rate without a commitment, the smallest purchase allowed, what happens to unspent balance, and whether a failed request still costs money.
The site, as it reads today
On 9 September 2026 the site introduced itself as "911Proxy - Premium Residential Proxies Provider". Written for search engines, their description says: "911proxy provides a Best Residential Proxies with more than 90M+ IP pools with high anonymity and breaks through IP limits."
Also on the page, stated plainly:
The product lines named on that page are residential, datacenter, ISP or static residential, SOCKS5 and a scraping or SERP API. They advertise 195 countries or locations. Payment methods mentioned: PayPal. The page offers some form of free trial. A refund or money-back term is mentioned. Their pricing page is titled "Residential Proxy Plan - Reliable Online Proxy Service Provider - 911Proxy".
Those are claims, and claims are free. They earn their place here only because the date makes them checkable later.
Age, and why it matters here
The domain was registered on 14 February 2020, through NameCheap, Inc, which makes it about 6 years old. We pulled that from the registry on 23 April 2026. The Internet Archive holds 20 snapshots of the site, the earliest from June 2006. The current registration term ends 14 February 2027.
None of it predicts success rate. It is here because domain age and archive depth are free to check, and a provider whose public record starts last quarter deserves a smaller first order.
Their published surface
A crawl of 5.871 pages returned 354 location pages and 3998 use-case pages.
Site size is a signal about marketing budget rather than network quality, and the two are frequently unrelated. It is useful for a different reason: a provider with many pricing pages is usually segmenting hard, and a provider with none is selling by quotation.
Whether anyone is still working on it
Our crawl of their site found 5,871 pages carrying a date. The oldest is from August 2026 and the newest from August 2026. 5,871 of them carry a date inside the last twelve months.
Timestamps are not quality, and a company still publishing is at least a company still trading. That is worth more than it sounds in a market where providers disappear without notice.
The questions behind the numbers
The entry price is not the effective price
Divide what you spent in a month by what you actually used, and you have the only rate worth quoting. It usually sits well above the figure on the homepage, because tiers, minimums and unused allocation all sit between the two.
What happens at the end of the month
Find out whether unspent traffic rolls over, expires, or expires only on some plans. The answer changes the effective rate by more than most of the price differences buyers spend their time arguing about.
What the lowest rate actually costs
The lowest published rate in this market usually sits behind a monthly commitment measured in thousands. Quoting it beside a pay as you go rate is not a comparison. Compare the rate you can reach today.
The comparison, honestly framed
Here are the comparisons that survive contact with a real workload:
| Question to ask | 911Proxy | HProxy |
|---|---|---|
| Entry price | Not verified by us, read their page | From $0.44/GB, pay as you go |
| Does unused balance expire? | Their terms page answers this | Never |
| Minimum commitment | Worth confirming in writing before you commit | None |
| Identity checks | Read their current terms | Card orders are screened, and verification is sometimes requested |
| Targeting | Worth confirming in writing before you commit | Country, city and ISP |
| Free way to evaluate | Read their current terms | Free proxy list and proxy checker |
Treat the right-hand column as a claim by an interested party, because it is one. Every line in it is checkable on our own pages and in our own terms.
What to do instead of reading more comparisons
The steps below take about ten minutes and settle the question properly.
- Take the smallest paid unit each provider will sell you. A free trial works for a first pass, though trials sometimes ride better pools than paid plans do.
- Fire the same batch through both on one afternoon. Different days are different conditions, and that ruins the comparison.
- Write down two numbers per provider: the share of requests that succeeded, and the traffic it cost.
- Take a handful of the addresses you were given and verify their country and type against a checker you do not control.
- Go with whichever performed, then measure again next quarter. Networks change underneath you.
Comparable providers
We hold the same record for these, and the same honest limits apply to each:
- Tckworld alternatives
- Teletype alternatives
- Tendem alternatives
- Teneo Protocol alternatives
- Tesonet alternatives
- The Social Proxy alternatives
What we sell, stated plainly
If you want our side of it: $0.44 per GB for residential, pay as you go, nothing expires, and the free tools stay free. We would rather you measured than believed us, which is why the test comes before this paragraph rather than after it.
