If you are comparing Bartproxies against anything else, the first thing to fix is units. A per-gigabyte rate against a per-address rate is not a comparison, and half the proxy provider market prices in a different unit to the other half.
Everything we can stand behind
You will find them at bartproxies.com. In our own records they sit in the proxy provider category.
There is no price in this comparison because we do not have one we can date and attribute. What follows instead is the set of questions that decide the cost once you do read their page.
Check the reachable rate, the minimum, the expiry terms and the failure billing, and date your note. A price without those four attached is not a price.
The site, as it reads today
The title tag on 9 September 2026 was "Bart Proxies , Fresh Static Residential IPs. Unlimited Bandwidth. No Throttling.". In the description they hand to search engines: "Fresh and Virgin ISP proxies with unlimited bandwidth, unlimited threads. Fresh native proxies on Tier 1 Networks. ATandT, Verizon, Comcast, Spectrum ISP Proxies. Unbanned on all websites, 100GBPS ports, 20MS pings. Best proxies for scraping, automation, multi-accounting."
Also on the page, stated plainly:
The product lines named on that page are ISP or static residential and SOCKS5. A refund or money-back term is mentioned. Their pricing page is titled "Native ISP Proxies from $1.40/IP , Real ATandT and Comcast IPs, Bart Proxies".
That is the vendor speaking, not us. We print it because a claim with a date attached is at least falsifiable.
Age, and why it matters here
The domain was registered on 12 September 2019, through Squarespace Domains II LLC, which makes it about 6 years old. Checked against the registry on 23 April 2026. The registration currently runs to 12 September 2026.
None of it predicts success rate. It is here because domain age and archive depth are free to check, and a provider whose public record starts last quarter deserves a smaller first order.
Their published surface
Our own crawl reached 666 of their pages. The mix was 8 pricing pages.
Site size is a signal about marketing budget rather than network quality, and the two are frequently unrelated. It is useful for a different reason: a provider with many pricing pages is usually segmenting hard, and a provider with none is selling by quotation.
How recently the site moved
Our crawl of their site found 666 pages carrying a date. The oldest is from July 2026 and the newest from July 2026. 666 of them carry a date inside the last twelve months.
Timestamps are not quality, and a company still publishing is at least a company still trading. That is worth more than it sounds in a market where providers disappear without notice.
The questions behind the numbers
Shared or dedicated changes everything
A shared address arrives with a history you did not create and cannot see. For read-only work it rarely matters. For anything that keeps a session, it is the most common cause of unexplained failure.
Who pays for the requests that fail
Divide the spend by the successful responses, not by the requests sent. That single change reorders most price comparisons in this market, and your accounting will use it eventually anyway.
The limit that stops the job
Bandwidth is rarely the constraint on a real workload. Concurrent connections, requests per second and per-session caps are, and they are frequently buried in the documentation rather than the pricing page.
The comparison, honestly framed
Here are the comparisons that survive contact with a real workload:
| Question to ask | Bartproxies | HProxy |
|---|---|---|
| Entry price | Not verified by us, read their page | From $0.44/GB, pay as you go |
| Does unused balance expire? | Read their current terms | Never |
| Minimum commitment | On their own terms page | None |
| Identity checks | Not published clearly, ask before paying | Card orders are screened, and verification is sometimes requested |
| Targeting | On their own terms page | Country, city and ISP |
| Free way to evaluate | Not published clearly, ask before paying | Free proxy list and proxy checker |
A table like this can rank the things that are written down. It cannot rank the thing that matters most, which is how the network behaves against the site you care about.
The measurement that outranks every review
This costs less than a coffee and produces the only evidence that applies to your workload.
- Take the smallest paid unit each provider will sell you. A free trial works for a first pass, though trials sometimes ride better pools than paid plans do.
- Fire the same batch through both on one afternoon. Different days are different conditions, and that ruins the comparison.
- Write down two numbers per provider: the share of requests that succeeded, and the traffic it cost.
- Take a handful of the addresses you were given and verify their country and type against a checker you do not control.
- Go with whichever performed, then measure again next quarter. Networks change underneath you.
The rest of the shortlist
Buyers comparing this name usually have two or three of these open in other tabs:
- Data5u alternatives
- Databay alternatives
- DataImpulse alternatives
- Dawn Internet alternatives
- Decodo alternatives
- Dedicatedproxies alternatives
What we sell, stated plainly
If you want our side of it: $0.44 per GB for residential, pay as you go, nothing expires, and the free tools stay free. We would rather you measured than believed us, which is why the test comes before this paragraph rather than after it.
