Comparison

MoMoProxy alternatives: what to check before you switch

A MoMoProxy alternative, judged by a competitor who says so up front: the record we hold, the gaps in it, and the test that outranks this page.

HProxy Team··5 min read
HProxy.Comparison

Free proxies won't hold up here.

Shared datacenter IPs get flagged and dropped fast. When it has to hold, gaming, streaming, accounts, you need mobile and residential IPs that read as a real device, from $0.44/GB, pay as you go.

Residential proxies

The shortest useful answer about MoMoProxy: find out what their current published rate is, find out whether your balance expires, then measure success rate on your own target. Everything below expands those three steps.

MoMoProxy on the record

The company behind the name sits at momoproxy.com.

A price is missing here on purpose. We have not captured a sourced rate for MoMoProxy recently enough to publish one, and a stale number in this market is a wrong number.

Their pricing page will answer three of the four questions that matter. Send an email for the fourth, which is usually whether blocked requests are billed, and keep the reply.

What MoMoProxy says about itself today

As of 9 September 2026 the tab reads "MoMoProxy - 150M+ Residential Proxy Server Provider". Their meta description, the sentence Google shows under the link, says: "Buy 150M+ best premium sticky and rotating residential proxies from $1/G with 99.96% success rate and 0.51s fast speed from USA and other 200+ Locations."

The rest of what the page puts in writing:

The product lines named on that page are residential, datacenter, ISP or static residential and SOCKS5. They advertise 200 countries or locations. The page offers some form of free trial. Support is advertised as around the clock.

That is the vendor speaking, not us. We print it because a claim with a date attached is at least falsifiable.

What the registration record shows

The domain was registered on 8 April 2024, through NameSilo, LLC, which makes it about 2 years old. That record was read from the registry on 23 April 2026. The Internet Archive holds 17 snapshots of the site, the earliest from August 2021. The registry shows it renewed to 8 April 2027.

Age is not quality. A long registration does not make a network good, and a new one does not make it bad. What it does rule out is the shortest-lived pattern in this market, which is a site that appears, sells, and is gone inside a year.

The shape of their site

A crawl of 613 pages returned 443 blog pages, 8 location pages and 104 use-case pages.

Read it as a map of what they emphasise. It is our count, from our crawler, on the date shown, and it is the only figure on this page that neither of us can dispute.

The activity record

Our crawl of their site found 613 pages carrying a date, 443 of them articles. The oldest is from August 2026 and the newest from August 2026. 613 of them carry a date inside the last twelve months.

Recent dates prove somebody is still at the keyboard. They prove nothing about the network, which is what the test at the end of this page is for.

Where published figures stop being useful

Ten million addresses, and none of them yours

Claims of ten million, one hundred million or more say nothing about whether your requests get through this week. Your job meets the handful of exits it draws, in your countries, against one target. Rotation policy and freshness move that outcome far more than the headline total.

The entry price is not the effective price

Rates in this market are quoted from the bottom of the table. The relevant question is which row you land on at your volume, and whether reaching a cheaper row costs more in commitment than it saves per unit.

Threads, not gigabytes, are often the ceiling

Rate limits are often enforced per account rather than per plan, which means buying more traffic does not raise them. Confirm how yours scales before you assume a bigger plan runs faster.

A comparison that admits what it cannot say

The table answers what we can answer and marks what we cannot:

Question to askMoMoProxyHProxy
Entry priceNot verified by us, read their pageFrom $0.44/GB, pay as you go
Does unused balance expire?Check the current terms, this one movesNever
Minimum commitmentRead their current termsNone
Identity checksWorth confirming in writing before you commitCard orders are screened, and verification is sometimes requested
TargetingRead their current termsCountry, city and ISP
Free way to evaluateWorth confirming in writing before you commitFree proxy list and proxy checker

Every unfilled cell above is a question to put to them directly, in writing, before money changes hands. Vendors answer those questions readily; comparison sites guess at them.

How to settle it yourself in ten minutes

Run this before you commit any volume. It replaces every opinion on this page, including ours.

  1. Buy the minimum each side offers. Prefer a small paid batch over a trial, because trial traffic does not always ride the same pool.
  2. Send an identical workload through each: same target, same tooling, same time of day, same request mix.
  3. Log successes, failures and gigabytes used. Cost per successful request is the figure you are after.
  4. Verify a slice of the exits independently. Country labels in this market are self-reported and are not always right.
  5. Take the winner and set a reminder to run this again, since a result has a shelf life of about a quarter.

Others in this market

Nearest alternatives by product shape rather than by who pays us, since nobody does:

Where HProxy sits in that test

Our own lane is easy to state. Residential starts at $0.44 per GB, the balance is topped up when you want and does not expire, there is no subscription unless the optional discount suits you, and city and ISP targeting are included rather than sold separately. If the test above puts us second on your target, buy the winner.

Frequently asked questions

Why look for a MoMoProxy alternative at all?
The usual reasons any buyer compares two providers: the pricing model stopped fitting the usage pattern, a target started blocking, a specific country underperformed, a balance expired, or support went quiet. None of those is visible from a marketing page, which is why a small paid test on your own target settles it faster than any review.
How is HProxy different?
The models differ more than the products do. HProxy is pay as you go from a balance you top up when you want, the balance does not expire, there is no subscription unless the optional discount suits you, and residential starts at $0.44 per GB with city and ISP targeting included. Whether that beats a tiered plan depends on your usage pattern, which a short test settles.
Do I have to talk to sales or sign a contract to switch?
Not with us. You can sign up, add funds and send traffic without a call, a minimum or a subscription. Whether another provider requires any of those is on their own pricing page and is worth reading, because a required commitment is part of the price even when it is not part of the rate.
How often should I re-test a provider?
Quarterly is a reasonable rhythm for most workloads, and immediately after a noticeable drop in success rate. Pools are rebuilt, suppliers change and detection improves, so a benchmark from last year describes a network that no longer exists.
Does a bigger pool mean better results?
No. Your job meets only the exits it draws, in the countries it needs, against one target's defences. Freshness and rotation policy move the outcome far more than the headline total, and pool totals across this market are counted generously and rarely audited.

Proxies that don't die mid-job

Residential, ISP, datacenter and mobile, verified by the same engine that runs tens of millions of checks. They read as a real device and hold up under load. Pay as you go, and your balance never expires. $0.44/GB is the 2,000 GB+ rate; a single gigabyte is $0.50/GB, with no minimum order.

129M+ proxy checks run · 100+ countries · HTTP / HTTPS / SOCKS · re-checked every few minutes · no signup