Comparison

Scrape alternatives without a minimum spend

Comparing a Scrape alternative? The published numbers, the questions their pricing page leaves open, and a ten minute test that beats every review.

HProxy Team··4 min read
HProxy.Comparison

Free proxies won't hold up here.

Shared datacenter IPs get flagged and dropped fast. When it has to hold, gaming, streaming, accounts, you need mobile and residential IPs that read as a real device, from $0.44/GB, pay as you go.

Residential proxies

Before anything about Scrape: pool totals, uptime badges and country counts predict almost nothing about your result. What predicts it is a measured success rate on your own target, and that measurement costs a few dollars.

The record we hold

Scrape operates from scrape.do.

Scrape is not in our priced record, so nothing about their rate appears below. That gap is stated rather than filled, which is the only honest option available.

Look for the tier you would actually land in, not the one at the bottom of the table, and find the expiry and failed-request clauses before the rate impresses you.

How Scrape presents itself

The one-paragraph pitch on their own page: "Unmatched speed, unbeatable prices, unblocked access. Scrape.do is a web scraping powerhouse."

Also on the page, stated plainly:

The product lines named on that page are a scraping or SERP API. Payment methods mentioned: crypto and cards. The page offers some form of free trial. Support is advertised as around the clock. Their pricing page is titled "Web Scraping API Pricing, Scrape.do".

None of that is verified performance. It is what the vendor chose to publish, recorded with a date so you can see whether it still says the same thing.

The shape of their site

Our own crawl reached 450 of their pages, last run 19 June 2026. The mix was 207 blog pages, 1 pricing page and 3 integration pages.

That mix tells you how the company sells. Heavy location pages mean a geography-led pitch, heavy blog means a search-led one, and a single pricing page usually means one simple offer or one sales call.

The activity record

Our crawl of their site found 339 pages carrying a date, 205 of them articles. The oldest is from January 1970 and the newest from August 2026. 217 of them carry a date inside the last twelve months.

An actively maintained site is table stakes rather than a recommendation. It does rule out the failure that costs buyers the most here, which is prepaying a company that has quietly stopped.

The parts no marketing page answers

What happens when it breaks at two in the morning

Test the support channel before you need it. Ask something specific and technical, and judge both the speed and whether the answer came from somebody who understood the question.

Why a cheap address is often a used one

A shared address arrives with a history you did not create and cannot see. For read-only work it rarely matters. For anything that keeps a session, it is the most common cause of unexplained failure.

Who pays for the requests that fail

Some vendors bill every request, some bill only successful ones, and the difference is the whole comparison once a target starts blocking. A cheap rate with a fifty percent success rate is twice its advertised price.

Side by side, with the blanks left blank

This is the shortest table that still decides the purchase:

Question to askScrapeHProxy
Entry priceNot verified by us, read their pageFrom $0.44/GB, pay as you go
Does unused balance expire?Worth confirming in writing before you commitNever
Minimum commitmentTheir terms page answers thisNone
Identity checksCheck the current terms, this one movesCard orders are screened, and verification is sometimes requested
TargetingNot published clearly, ask before payingCountry, city and ISP
Free way to evaluateOn their own terms pageFree proxy list and proxy checker

Blanks in that table are deliberate. We print what we read and date it, and leave the rest empty rather than repeating something we cannot stand behind.

A test worth more than this comparison

Do this once and you will never need a comparison page for this decision again.

  1. Open an account on each and add the smallest amount they take. Skip the trial if a paid unit is cheap enough to buy outright.
  2. Point both at your real target, through your real tool, on the same day, with the same mix of requests.
  3. Log successes, failures and gigabytes used. Cost per successful request is the figure you are after.
  4. Verify a slice of the exits independently. Country labels in this market are self-reported and are not always right.
  5. Take the winner and set a reminder to run this again, since a result has a shelf life of about a quarter.

Others in this market

Nearest alternatives by product shape rather than by who pays us, since nobody does:

The competing offer, for completeness

We are the pay as you go option in this market. Residential from $0.44 per GB, ISP and datacenter per address, mobile alongside them, all from one balance with nothing to forfeit. That model wins on irregular volume and loses on very large steady volume, which is worth knowing before you test.

Frequently asked questions

Why look for a Scrape alternative at all?
The usual reasons any buyer compares two providers: the pricing model stopped fitting the usage pattern, a target started blocking, a specific country underperformed, a balance expired, or support went quiet. None of those is visible from a marketing page, which is why a small paid test on your own target settles it faster than any review.
What does Scrape advertise?
We do not hold a current, sourced price for Scrape, so this page does not print one. Read their own pricing page for the rate, the minimum and the commitment, and note the date you read it, because all three move.
How do I compare two providers fairly?
Match the units first, because residential is billed per gigabyte, datacenter and ISP per address, and mobile per day or per port. Then compare the rate you can actually reach today rather than the volume tier behind a commitment. Finish by measuring the success rate on your own target, since a cheap request that fails costs more than a dearer one that works.
Is a cheaper provider usually worse?
Not reliably. Price in this market reflects the supply model and the sales overhead as much as the network. What price does not tell you is the success rate on your target, and that is the figure that decides whether the cheaper option was cheap or expensive. Measure before assuming either way.
How often should I re-test a provider?
Quarterly is a reasonable rhythm for most workloads, and immediately after a noticeable drop in success rate. Pools are rebuilt, suppliers change and detection improves, so a benchmark from last year describes a network that no longer exists.

Proxies that don't die mid-job

Residential, ISP, datacenter and mobile, verified by the same engine that runs tens of millions of checks. They read as a real device and hold up under load. Pay as you go, and your balance never expires. $0.44/GB is the 2,000 GB+ rate; a single gigabyte is $0.50/GB, with no minimum order.

129M+ proxy checks run · 100+ countries · HTTP / HTTPS / SOCKS · re-checked every few minutes · no signup