You can settle this yourself for less than the price of lunch. That is the argument of this page, and the sections before the test exist to tell you what to measure once you start.
ProxyMix on the record
The company behind the name sits at proxymix.net. We carry them as a proxy provider.
A price is missing here on purpose. We have not captured a sourced rate for ProxyMix recently enough to publish one, and a stale number in this market is a wrong number.
Copy down the entry rate, the commitment attached to the cheapest rate, the minimum top-up and the expiry rule. Those four turn a marketing figure into something you can compare.
What ProxyMix says about itself today
On 9 September 2026 their homepage carried the title "Купить прокси. Быстрые HTTPs, Socks5 прокси IPv4 недорого". The one-paragraph pitch on their own page: "Лучшие прокси сервера для инстаграм, прокси для гугла, ИАМ. Анонимные, недорогие, элитные, быстрые платные прокси адвансы. Мгновенная покупка. 24/7 поддержка."
Taken from the same page, on the same day:
The product lines named on that page are SOCKS5. Payment methods mentioned: cards. Support is advertised as around the clock.
That is the vendor speaking, not us. We print it because a claim with a date attached is at least falsifiable.
What the registration record shows
The domain was registered on 2 March 2024, through HOSTINGER operations, UAB, which makes it about 2 years old. Those dates come from a registry query on 9 September 2026. Their registration is booked through 2 March 2029.
Age is not quality. A long registration does not make a network good, and a new one does not make it bad. What it does rule out is the shortest-lived pattern in this market, which is a site that appears, sells, and is gone inside a year.
The shape of their site
A crawl of 371 pages returned 109 blog pages and 2 pricing pages.
Read it as a map of what they emphasise. It is our count, from our crawler, on the date shown, and it is the only figure on this page that neither of us can dispute.
Signs of life
Our crawl of their site found 371 pages carrying a date, 109 of them articles. The oldest is from January 2016 and the newest from August 2026. 240 of them carry a date inside the last twelve months.
Recent dates prove somebody is still at the keyboard. They prove nothing about the network, which is what the test at the end of this page is for.
Where published figures stop being useful
Ten million addresses, and none of them yours
Claims of ten million, one hundred million or more say nothing about whether your requests get through this week. Your job meets the handful of exits it draws, in your countries, against one target. Rotation policy and freshness move that outcome far more than the headline total.
The entry price is not the effective price
Rates in this market are quoted from the bottom of the table. The relevant question is which row you land on at your volume, and whether reaching a cheaper row costs more in commitment than it saves per unit.
Threads, not gigabytes, are often the ceiling
Rate limits are often enforced per account rather than per plan, which means buying more traffic does not raise them. Confirm how yours scales before you assume a bigger plan runs faster.
A comparison that admits what it cannot say
The table answers what we can answer and marks what we cannot:
| Question to ask | ProxyMix | HProxy |
|---|---|---|
| Entry price | Not verified by us, read their page | From $0.44/GB, pay as you go |
| Does unused balance expire? | Check the current terms, this one moves | Never |
| Minimum commitment | Read their current terms | None |
| Identity checks | Worth confirming in writing before you commit | Card orders are screened, and verification is sometimes requested |
| Targeting | Read their current terms | Country, city and ISP |
| Free way to evaluate | Worth confirming in writing before you commit | Free proxy list and proxy checker |
Two notes on that table. The rows we left for you to check are not evasions: those terms change, and printing a stale figure is exactly the failure this page is trying to avoid. And no table can hold the number that should decide your purchase, which is the success rate on your own target.
A test worth more than this comparison
Do this once and you will never need a comparison page for this decision again.
- Buy the minimum each side offers. Prefer a small paid batch over a trial, because trial traffic does not always ride the same pool.
- Send an identical workload through each: same target, same tooling, same time of day, same request mix.
- Log successes, failures and gigabytes used. Cost per successful request is the figure you are after.
- Verify a slice of the exits independently. Country labels in this market are self-reported and are not always right.
- Take the winner and set a reminder to run this again, since a result has a shelf life of about a quarter.
The other names that come up
Other providers in the same bracket, priced and dated the same way:
- Elfproxy alternatives
- Elite Proxy alternatives
- EliteProxies alternatives
- Enigmaproxy alternatives
- Enode alternatives
- Enot alternatives
Where HProxy sits in that test
Our own lane is easy to state. Residential starts at $0.44 per GB, the balance is topped up when you want and does not expire, there is no subscription unless the optional discount suits you, and city and ISP targeting are included rather than sold separately. If the test above puts us second on your target, buy the winner.
