Readers land here mid-decision, usually with a cart open somewhere. The fastest thing we can do is set out what Aluvia publishes, what it does not, and what a few dollars of testing settles better than any argument.
Aluvia on the record
The company behind the name sits at aluvia.io.
What we do not hold is a current, sourced price for Aluvia. Rather than print a figure we cannot stand behind, this page leaves it out and tells you what to look for when you read their page yourself.
Read their page for the reachable rate rather than the headline, the minimum spend, the expiry clause and the billing treatment of blocked requests. Write down the date, because all four move.
What is on their front page
On 9 September 2026 their homepage carried the title "Global proxy IPs for AI agents · Aluvia". Written for search engines, their description says: "Aluvia lets agents change their IP address using a global network of residential IPs."
The rest of what the page puts in writing:
The page offers some form of free trial. Their pricing page is titled "Aluvia pricing , $2/GB, 10 MB free".
That is the vendor speaking, not us. We print it because a claim with a date attached is at least falsifiable.
Where published figures stop being useful
What happens when it breaks at two in the morning
Support quality is invisible until it is the only thing that matters. A cheap provider that takes three days to answer a routing problem has cost you more than the saving, and no pricing page reveals that.
Why a cheap address is often a used one
An address you share carries the reputation of everyone else on it. That is acceptable for some work and fatal for anything involving a login. The price difference between shared and dedicated usually reflects exactly this.
Who pays for the requests that fail
Divide the spend by the successful responses, not by the requests sent. That single change reorders most price comparisons in this market, and your accounting will use it eventually anyway.
A comparison that admits what it cannot say
This is the shortest table that still decides the purchase:
| Question to ask | Aluvia | HProxy |
|---|---|---|
| Entry price | Not verified by us, read their page | From $0.44/GB, pay as you go |
| Does unused balance expire? | On their own terms page | Never |
| Minimum commitment | Read their current terms | None |
| Identity checks | Worth confirming in writing before you commit | Card orders are screened, and verification is sometimes requested |
| Targeting | Their terms page answers this | Country, city and ISP |
| Free way to evaluate | Check the current terms, this one moves | Free proxy list and proxy checker |
That comparison covers what is publishable. What is not publishable, and what actually decides this, is how many of your requests come back correct.
How to settle it yourself in ten minutes
Run this before you commit any volume. It replaces every opinion on this page, including ours.
- Buy the minimum each side offers. Prefer a small paid batch over a trial, because trial traffic does not always ride the same pool.
- Send an identical workload through each: same target, same tooling, same time of day, same request mix.
- Measure what came back correctly and what it consumed, then divide the spend by the successes.
- Push a sample of exit addresses through an independent checker and confirm the country and connection type are what was advertised.
- Keep whichever pool won on your job. Re-run this whenever success rate drops or the bill moves.
Who else is in this bracket
The same treatment, applied to the providers most often weighed against this one:
- 1Abc alternatives
- 2Captcha alternatives
- 4Gproxies alternatives
- 4GProxy alternatives
- 50na50 alternatives
- 5Socks alternatives
Our side of it
What we offer is one account holding residential, ISP, mobile and datacenter, priced from $0.44 per GB on residential, with no tier to climb and no allocation to lose at month end. Whether that suits you depends on how steady your volume is.
