We keep a record of what providers in this market charge and what happens to them over time. This page is the part of that record covering Hailiangip, written up for somebody deciding today.
What we can and cannot tell you about Hailiangip
The company behind the name sits at hailiangip.com.
Hailiangip is not in our priced record, so nothing about their rate appears below. That gap is stated rather than filled, which is the only honest option available.
Their pricing page will answer three of the four questions that matter. Send an email for the fourth, which is usually whether blocked requests are billed, and keep the reply.
What Hailiangip says about itself today
Read 9 September 2026, the homepage titles itself "杭州流冠科技有限公司-流冠IP代理-高匿HTTP-在线代理ip-隧道代理-百万IP服务供应商". Written for search engines, their description says: "流冠代理（www.hailiangip.com）是http代理ip服务供应商，拥有百万级独立ip池，覆盖300多城市，低延迟高可用率稳定专业！爬虫代理,网页代理ip,企业级代理ip,socks5代理,电脑换ip,https代理,私密代理ip,免费代理ip,独享代理ip,在线代理,代理服务器等!"
The rest of what the page puts in writing:
The product lines named on that page are SOCKS5. We found no separate pricing page linked from the homepage, which usually means the price arrives by quotation.
That is the vendor speaking, not us. We print it because a claim with a date attached is at least falsifiable.
What the registration record shows
The domain was registered on 9 October 2018, through Alibaba Cloud Computing (Beijing) Co., Ltd, which makes it about 7 years old. Registry data as of 23 April 2026. The Internet Archive holds 20 snapshots of the site, the earliest from March 2020. It is paid up until 9 October 2027.
Age is not quality. A long registration does not make a network good, and a new one does not make it bad. What it does rule out is the shortest-lived pattern in this market, which is a site that appears, sells, and is gone inside a year.
What the advertised numbers cannot tell you
The reputation you inherit
A shared address arrives with a history you did not create and cannot see. For read-only work it rarely matters. For anything that keeps a session, it is the most common cause of unexplained failure.
Ask whether failed requests are billed
Some vendors bill every request, some bill only successful ones, and the difference is the whole comparison once a target starts blocking. A cheap rate with a fifty percent success rate is twice its advertised price.
Threads, not gigabytes, are often the ceiling
Bandwidth is rarely the constraint on a real workload. Concurrent connections, requests per second and per-session caps are, and they are frequently buried in the documentation rather than the pricing page.
What separates them, in a table
The rows that matter, with our own answers stated plainly:
| Question to ask | Hailiangip | HProxy |
|---|---|---|
| Entry price | Not verified by us, read their page | From $0.44/GB, pay as you go |
| Does unused balance expire? | On their own terms page | Never |
| Minimum commitment | Their terms page answers this | None |
| Identity checks | Check the current terms, this one moves | Card orders are screened, and verification is sometimes requested |
| Targeting | Read their current terms | Country, city and ISP |
| Free way to evaluate | Worth confirming in writing before you commit | Free proxy list and proxy checker |
Two notes on that table. The rows we left for you to check are not evasions: those terms change, and printing a stale figure is exactly the failure this page is trying to avoid. And no table can hold the number that should decide your purchase, which is the success rate on your own target.
The ten minute version of this decision
For a few dollars you can get a verdict specific to your job, which no comparison page can honestly promise you.
- Open an account on each and add the smallest amount they take. Skip the trial if a paid unit is cheap enough to buy outright.
- Point both at your real target, through your real tool, on the same day, with the same mix of requests.
- Count how many requests returned what you wanted, and how much bandwidth each side spent doing it.
- Spot-check the exits. Confirm they are in the country you paid for and the connection type you were sold.
- Take the winner and set a reminder to run this again, since a result has a shelf life of about a quarter.
Others in this market
Nearest alternatives by product shape rather than by who pays us, since nobody does:
- FOGLDN alternatives
- Forumotion alternatives
- Foxscrape alternatives
- Foxxyproxies alternatives
- Freeproxy24 alternatives
- Freeproxylist alternatives
Our side of it
HProxy is pay as you go from $0.44 per GB on residential, with ISP, mobile and datacenter under one balance and no commitment attached to any of them. Run the test. If we lose on your target, we lose, and you have your answer.
