We keep a record of what providers in this market charge and what happens to them over time. This page is the part of that record covering Cliproxy, written up for somebody deciding today.
Cliproxy on the record
Cliproxy operates from cliproxy.com.
A price is missing here on purpose. We have not captured a sourced rate for Cliproxy recently enough to publish one, and a stale number in this market is a wrong number.
Note the price, the unit it is quoted in, the minimum, and the expiry. Unit and expiry are where most comparisons in this market quietly go wrong.
What is on their front page
On 9 September 2026 their homepage carried the title "Cliproxy - The world's best and fastest Dynamic Residential IP". The description they publish for search engines reads: "CliProxy has the fastest residential IP, with 100 million residential IPs from 180+ countries."
Reading the same page for the things buyers actually ask about:
The product lines named on that page are residential and ISP or static residential. The page offers some form of free trial. A refund or money-back term is mentioned. Their pricing page is titled "Dynamic Residential IP pricing, just $0.50/GB".
Those are claims, and claims are free. They earn their place here only because the date makes them checkable later.
The domain record
The domain was registered on 12 November 2023, through Cloudflare, Inc, which makes it about 2 years old. Those dates come from a registry query on 23 April 2026. Their registration is booked through 12 November 2026.
Age is not quality. A long registration does not make a network good, and a new one does not make it bad. What it does rule out is the shortest-lived pattern in this market, which is a site that appears, sells, and is gone inside a year.
How much site there is
A crawl of 371 pages returned 170 blog pages and 42 pricing pages.
Read it as a map of what they emphasise. It is our count, from our crawler, on the date shown, and it is the only figure on this page that neither of us can dispute.
Signs of life
Our crawl of their site found 371 pages carrying a date, 170 of them articles. The oldest is from March 2026 and the newest from March 2026. 371 of them carry a date inside the last twelve months.
Recent dates prove somebody is still at the keyboard. They prove nothing about the network, which is what the test at the end of this page is for.
Where the interest in Cliproxy goes
Google reports 10 searches a month worldwide across the terms carrying this brand: 10 a month for a review of them. Figures read from Google Keyword Planner on 9 September 2026.
Most of that demand is people checking whether to trust it. That is what this page is written for, and it is why the sections above lead with what is published rather than with a verdict.
Where published figures stop being useful
The reputation you inherit
A shared address arrives with a history you did not create and cannot see. For read-only work it rarely matters. For anything that keeps a session, it is the most common cause of unexplained failure.
Ask whether failed requests are billed
Some vendors bill every request, some bill only successful ones, and the difference is the whole comparison once a target starts blocking. A cheap rate with a fifty percent success rate is twice its advertised price.
Threads, not gigabytes, are often the ceiling
Bandwidth is rarely the constraint on a real workload. Concurrent connections, requests per second and per-session caps are, and they are frequently buried in the documentation rather than the pricing page.
A comparison that admits what it cannot say
The rows that matter, with our own answers stated plainly:
| Question to ask | Cliproxy | HProxy |
|---|---|---|
| Entry price | Not verified by us, read their page | From $0.44/GB, pay as you go |
| Does unused balance expire? | Worth confirming in writing before you commit | Never |
| Minimum commitment | Not published clearly, ask before paying | None |
| Identity checks | On their own terms page | Card orders are screened, and verification is sometimes requested |
| Targeting | Their terms page answers this | Country, city and ISP |
| Free way to evaluate | Check the current terms, this one moves | Free proxy list and proxy checker |
Two notes on that table. The rows we left for you to check are not evasions: those terms change, and printing a stale figure is exactly the failure this page is trying to avoid. And no table can hold the number that should decide your purchase, which is the success rate on your own target.
The ten minute version of this decision
For a few dollars you can get a verdict specific to your job, which no comparison page can honestly promise you.
- Start with the smallest purchase each vendor allows, so the test costs less than the decision it replaces.
- Use your own scraper and your own target. A benchmark against a neutral site measures nothing you will experience.
- Measure what came back correctly and what it consumed, then divide the spend by the successes.
- Push a sample of exit addresses through an independent checker and confirm the country and connection type are what was advertised.
- Buy the one that won on your target, and diarise a re-test in three months.
The other names that come up
Other providers in the same bracket, priced and dated the same way:
- NewProxies alternatives
- Nexproxy alternatives
- Nginxproxymanager alternatives
- NinjaProxy alternatives
- NodeMaven alternatives
- Nodepay alternatives
The competing offer, for completeness
HProxy suits buyers who want to add funds, send traffic and stop thinking about it. Residential from $0.44 per GB, no commitment, nothing expiring. Buyers who need procurement paperwork and a named account manager are better served elsewhere, and we would rather say so here than waste your afternoon.
