People arrive at a scraping API comparison for one of two reasons: the price moved, or the thing stopped working. This page assumes you are in one of those two positions with Prospeo and wants to be useful in ten minutes rather than impressive in thirty.
What we can and cannot tell you about Prospeo
The company behind the name sits at prospeo.io. We carry them as a scraping API.
A price is missing here on purpose. We have not captured a sourced rate for Prospeo recently enough to publish one, and a stale number in this market is a wrong number.
Their pricing page will answer three of the four questions that matter. Send an email for the fourth, which is usually whether blocked requests are billed, and keep the reply.
What Prospeo says about itself today
On 9 September 2026 their homepage carried the title "Prospeo - Find Verified Emails and Phone Numbers for Outreach". In the description they hand to search engines: "Prospeo helps sales teams find verified business emails and mobile numbers. Export leads and connect with decision-makers."
Taken from the same page, on the same day:
We found no separate pricing page linked from the homepage, which usually means the price arrives by quotation.
Those are claims, and claims are free. They earn their place here only because the date makes them checkable later.
What the registration record shows
The Internet Archive holds 35 snapshots of the site, the earliest from August 2023.
Age is not quality. A long registration does not make a network good, and a new one does not make it bad. What it does rule out is the shortest-lived pattern in this market, which is a site that appears, sells, and is gone inside a year.
What they have built around the product
A crawl of 50.000 pages returned 1 pricing page and 1 integration page.
Read it as a map of what they emphasise. It is our count, from our crawler, on the date shown, and it is the only figure on this page that neither of us can dispute.
The demand around this name
Google reports 470 searches a month worldwide across the terms carrying this brand: 320 a month for their pricing, 80 a month for an alternative to them and 70 a month for a review of them. Figures read from Google Keyword Planner on 9 September 2026.
Most of that demand is people trying to work out what it costs. That is what this page is written for, and it is why the sections above lead with what is published rather than with a verdict.
At up to $36.24 a click, these are expensive words. Worth remembering when a review ranks first and happens to recommend whoever pays the most.
Where published figures stop being useful
Units first, prices second
Work out what your job actually consumes, in gigabytes or in concurrent addresses, before you look at any price. Without that number, no two quotations in this market can be compared at all.
A commitment is part of the price
Treat a required call with a salesperson as a cost. It delays the work, it usually arrives with an annual term attached, and it exists because the published price is negotiable in one direction only.
A verdict has a shelf life
Every review of this market, this one included, is a photograph of a moving thing. Read the date on any comparison you find, and discount it heavily once it is more than a few months old.
A comparison that admits what it cannot say
The rows that matter, with our own answers stated plainly:
| Question to ask | Prospeo | HProxy |
|---|---|---|
| Entry price | Not verified by us, read their page | From $0.44/GB, pay as you go |
| Does unused balance expire? | Worth confirming in writing before you commit | Never |
| Minimum commitment | Not published clearly, ask before paying | None |
| Identity checks | On their own terms page | Card orders are screened, and verification is sometimes requested |
| Targeting | Their terms page answers this | Country, city and ISP |
| Free way to evaluate | Check the current terms, this one moves | Free proxy list and proxy checker |
We would rather show an incomplete table than a confident wrong one. Anything we could not source is left for you to read at the source, with the date you read it.
A test worth more than this comparison
Do this once and you will never need a comparison page for this decision again.
- Buy the minimum each side offers. Prefer a small paid batch over a trial, because trial traffic does not always ride the same pool.
- Send an identical workload through each: same target, same tooling, same time of day, same request mix.
- Log successes, failures and gigabytes used. Cost per successful request is the figure you are after.
- Verify a slice of the exits independently. Country labels in this market are self-reported and are not always right.
- Keep whichever pool won on your job. Re-run this whenever success rate drops or the bill moves.
The other names that come up
Other providers in the same bracket, priced and dated the same way:
- Coresignal alternatives
- Scrapebox alternatives
- Scrapehero alternatives
- Scrapeless alternatives
- ScrapeOps alternatives
- Scrapeowl alternatives
The competing offer, for completeness
HProxy suits buyers who want to add funds, send traffic and stop thinking about it. Residential from $0.44 per GB, no commitment, nothing expiring. Buyers who need procurement paperwork and a named account manager are better served elsewhere, and we would rather say so here than waste your afternoon.
