A comparison written by a competitor is worth reading only if it says where the competitor loses. That rule shapes this page about Kissproxy, and the last section names the reader who should stay put.
The record we hold
The domain is kissproxy.online. They are filed here as a web proxy.
A price is missing here on purpose. We have not captured a sourced rate for Kissproxy recently enough to publish one, and a stale number in this market is a wrong number.
Note the price, the unit it is quoted in, the minimum, and the expiry. Unit and expiry are where most comparisons in this market quietly go wrong.
What the registration record shows
The domain was registered on 24 February 2026, through GMO Internet Group, Inc. d/b/a Onamae.com, which makes it about 0 years old. That record was read from the registry on 9 September 2026. The registry shows it renewed to 24 February 2027.
Read that as a floor rather than a recommendation. Longevity says somebody has kept paying the registrar, and in a market with this much churn that is worth ten seconds of your attention.
The same brand also appears at kissproxy.ga, kissproxy.gq and kissproxy.ml. Sibling domains are normal in this market and are worth knowing about, because support, terms and even the network behind them are not always the same.
What the advertised numbers cannot tell you
Logging, and who can read it
Anything routing your traffic can read it unless it is encrypted end to end, and can alter anything that is not. Assume the operator sees the metadata and decide whether that is acceptable for the work.
Why the pool number is the least useful figure
Claims of ten million, one hundred million or more say nothing about whether your requests get through this week. Your job meets the handful of exits it draws, in your countries, against one target. Rotation policy and freshness move that outcome far more than the headline total.
The reputation you inherit
Ask how many accounts can sit on one address at once. Where the answer is unlimited or unspecified, price the plan as shared regardless of what the product is called.
What separates them, in a table
The rows below are the ones that change what you pay and whether the job runs:
| Question to ask | Kissproxy | HProxy |
|---|---|---|
| Entry price | Not verified by us, read their page | From $0.44/GB, pay as you go |
| Does unused balance expire? | Check the current terms, this one moves | Never |
| Minimum commitment | Not published clearly, ask before paying | None |
| Identity checks | On their own terms page | Card orders are screened, and verification is sometimes requested |
| Targeting | Not published clearly, ask before paying | Country, city and ISP |
| Free way to evaluate | On their own terms page | Free proxy list and proxy checker |
Nothing in that table settles the decision on its own. It narrows the field to two or three, and then measurement finishes the job.
The ten minute version of this decision
For a few dollars you can get a verdict specific to your job, which no comparison page can honestly promise you.
- Buy the minimum each side offers. Prefer a small paid batch over a trial, because trial traffic does not always ride the same pool.
- Send an identical workload through each: same target, same tooling, same time of day, same request mix.
- Measure what came back correctly and what it consumed, then divide the spend by the successes.
- Push a sample of exit addresses through an independent checker and confirm the country and connection type are what was advertised.
- Take the winner and set a reminder to run this again, since a result has a shelf life of about a quarter.
Others in this market
Nearest alternatives by product shape rather than by who pays us, since nobody does:
- Nroxy alternatives
- Offeng alternatives
- Opensurf alternatives
- Patriotfiles alternatives
- Pkapk alternatives
- Polyzero alternatives
The competing offer, for completeness
We are the pay as you go option in this market. Residential from $0.44 per GB, ISP and datacenter per address, mobile alongside them, all from one balance with nothing to forfeit. That model wins on irregular volume and loses on very large steady volume, which is worth knowing before you test.
